Ink Notes: Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine Cartridge

Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine cartridge tinThis review is a little different in that I used cartridges for the review rather than bottled ink or a sample. I wanted to try some Pelikan Edelstein inks, but I didn’t want more bottles of ink but wanted more than a sample. So when the cartridges became available I took advantage of the opportunity. Cartridges cost more per milliliter but are less money out of pocket. Cartridges will also dry out over time, unlike bottled ink (at least ink in glass bottles). I picked Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine as my first cartridge since I’ve been itching to try a new green ink.

The Edelstein cartridges are long international so at 3 ml per cartridge that works out to about $0.44/ml. The six cartridges come in a nice tin and are protected by tissue paper inside the tin.

Aventurine is a nice bright green that has enough saturation to stand out with my preferred thin nibs. With wider or wetter nibs there’s some very nice shading. Pelikan is known for dry writing inks but Aventurine has good flow and I wouldn’t consider it a dry writing ink.

The ink is pleasant to use. I didn’t encounter any noticeable feathering or bleed-through with my common nibs and paper. With the wet Retro 51 medium nib I did encounter some feathering with cheap copy paper. There was also some show through with this nib and paper but no bleed-through.

The ink also dries fast. Considering how wet the ink looked when it hit the paper I was surprised it dried so fast. It was especially fast on Doane Paper (Jotter and writing pads) which is great for me since that’s what I use most. Drying time was longer, but very acceptable, on Rhodia paper.

I did notice that the ink as noticeably darker every morning when I first used the pen. The color returned to normal after a sentence or two. It remained darker even after the ink dried. Normally the ink brightens up just a bit as it dries.

I realize green ink is a negative is some countries and green isn’t a business ink. Despite that, I find the ink pleasing to look at when writing all day and used it as my daily driver for several days. I quickly ran through about 3/4 of the cartridge in my Franklin-Christoph Model 25 with a medium stub nib.

The ink barely leaves a trace after the water test, but it did leave a trace. But if you spilled a beer on your plan to make millions you could probably read enough to make about half that.

I show some swab comparisons in the gallery. While not an exact color match, I would use this ink the same way I would use Montblanc Irish Green. MB Irish Green is my bright green of choice although Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine would replace it if I didn’t already have a bottle of MB Irish Green. I don’t like it so much more that I would buy a bottle before the Irish Green is gone. I’ll have no problem using the cartrisges before they dry up.

Pens Used

The Franklin-Christoph Model 25 with a medium (0.9 mm) stub nib was inked up for a couple of weeks and was used as my daily writer for several days during that time. Except for the previously mentioned starting off dark each morning the ink was problem free. There wasn’t any skipping or false starts. I didn’t have any problems flushing this pen when I was done. This is one of the fastest and easiest ink flushes I’ve had in a long time.

The other pens shown in the writing samples were inked only long enough to do the writing samples. I moved the cartridge from pen to pen and gave the ink about 5 minutes to reach the nib. The Retro 51 was the only one that needed a little more time but it found the nib with just gravity.

Since there was still a little ink in the cartridge I decided to move it to my Franklin-Christoph Model 29 with a fine nib rather than waste the ink. Like the other pens flow and color depth is good.

Wrapping Up

Like I said, if I didn’t already have a bottle of MB Irish Green then Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine would be my bright green ink of choice. I like the colors equally but the Aventurine wins based on drying speed and shading.

Additional Reading

Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine – Handwritten Ink Review | edjelley.com

Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine – The Fountain Pen Network

Pelikan Edelstein Fountain Pen Ink – Office Supply Geek

Ink Review: Pelikan Edelstein Overview Ink – Goulet Pens Video overview of six Edelstein inks. Aventurine is shown at 7:40

Gallery

About these ads

Nib Notes: Esterbrook #9314-M Relief Medium Stub

Esterbrook #9314-M nibContinuing through my 9xxx series Esterbrook nibs I’m up to my Esterbrook #9314 Relief Medium Stub. Like other Esterbrook Relief Stubs this is a left oblique stub.

Like all 9xxx series nibs this one is tipped with an alloy Esterbrook called Osmiridium. “Esterbrook” is engraved lengthwise on the nib and “9314-M” is engraved lengthwise next to it. I prefer the lengthwise engraving over the typical engraving since it’s different. On some days I prefer the clean look of these nibs over the sunburst nibs.

My particular nib is fairly smooth but has some noticeable tooth to it, but it is smoother than the Esterbrook #2314-M nib that I have. The #2314-M is the same Relief Medium Stub but without any tipping material. Both nibs were rougher than I expected so this may not be a fair comparison. The #9314-M isn’t unpleasant to write with although I do prefer thinner nibs.

I picked up my Esterbrook #9314-M nib at last years Washington D.C. show. A search of the usual places don’t have any of these currently available for sale. Recent eBay sales completed for $28 to $36 and Anderson Pens has it listed for $30 but it’s out of stock.

Gallery

Sunday Notes and Links

four Cross pens

Cross Verve (bottom), Cross ATX (bottom chrome), Cross Apogee (top chrome, Cross Bailey (black pen)

I finished up my Cross pen quick reviews this past week. This was something a little different for me. The pens were collecting dust in my accumulation, and I had forgotten a couple even existed. So I inked them up for a day or two and then did a quick review. The Cross ATX was my first Cross pen and I can see why it led to other Cross fountain pens. What I dislike about it now, mainly the metal section, wouldn’t have bothered me when I got it.

Going into the reviews I had a low opinion of Cross quality but now that I’ve done them I’ve softened a little. I still stop short of recommending them, especially for first time buyers. The Verve definitely had terrible build quality, is my most expensive Cross, and has the best Cross nib, one that can compete with the best nibs out there. Two out of three may not be bad, but it isn’t good. The others are middle-of-the-road pens. Finally, it still irks me that Cross won’t include a converter in even their $100+ pens.

The Cross Reviews:

Site Update: I finally updated my Resources & Links page to reflect the additions to my RSS feed since May. There’s a few new sites on there.

Some links I found interesting this past week…

Giveaway: Pen Chalet is giving away three bottles of the now out of production Sailor inks. Pen Chalet

New Ink Announced: Tools of the trade: New ink from J. Herbin – [Quo Vadis Blog] //Wow! Yup, I’m excited about a boring grey ink. I just have to avoid trying to find a French retailer and be patient until it appears here in the States.

A new notebook company: Nib London A6 notebook and card review (and special offer) – [Pens! Paper! Pencils!]

Monteverde Laguna Fountain Pen Review / Monteverde Laguna Dolmakalem İncelemesi – [Write to Me Often]

Nock Co Maryapple Review – — [The Finer Point]

Seven Seas “Writer” Tomoe River Paper Journal (Size A5): A Review – [Scribalishess]

Review: Monteverde Intima Neon Green 1.1mm Stub Fountain Pen – [The Well-Appointed Desk]

Pen Review: Nakaya Decapod – [The Pen Habit] // I need to stop watching these Nakaya reviews.

Improving Penmanship: Self-torture or worth the effort? – [Dept4] //I should also stop reading articles on improving one’s writing. It’s embarrassing. But this article is pretty close to my thoughts. So far I’ve yet to actually “choose to.”

The Field Notes “Archival Wooden Box” Review – [Pen Paper Ink LetterPen Paper Ink Letter]

Pen Review: Kaweco Liliput – [The Gentleman Stationer]

Off-topic but interesting: Busy NYC Restaurant Solves Major Mystery by Reviewing Old Surveillance (via stevenf.com)

Pilot Capless Fermo Retractable Fountain Pen – F Nib — [The Clicky Post]

Ink Reviews

Private Reserve Avacado – [inklode]

Review: Pilot Iroshizuku Kon Peki – [Alt. Haven]

Sailor Doyou (Midsummer) – [Inkdependence!]

Cross ATX Quick Review

Unknown Cross Chrome fountain pen uncappedMy fourth Cross fountain pen is another one that I don’t have a recollection or record of acquiring. Even worse, I had no idea what model Cross pen this is. As luck would have it I found that this was the Cross ATX. Once I knew what pen this was I searched my email and found a shipping notice for this pen in 2006, making it my first Cross fountain pen despite me thinking the Cross Verve was my first Cross. So this ended up being a completely forgettable fountain pen. Although it must have made enough of a good impression to convince me to later buy the Cross Verve.

The pen has a medium steel nib that’s very smooth. A look through a loupe shows perfectly aligned nib tines. It’s got a pull off cap that fits securely. The nib seems to have a smaller sweet spot than my other medium nibs, As I wrote I would sometimes get skipping if I turned the nib while writing. The skipping was always because I turned the angle of the nib, not because of any actual flow problems.

The pen cap posts deeply and securely. The inner cap grips the barrel and hold the cap firmly in place. Since it posts deeply it doesn’t add much to the length of the pen. The pen still feels well balanced when posted, but that is from someone who doesn’t post his pens.

The chrome (metal) section is a problem for me, especially today when it’s 90º here. It does give the pen a nice sleek look. When I uncapped the pen for the first time I thought the pen grew because the section makes the pen look longer.

The clip presses firmly against the pen. This makes it hard to clip into my pockets, but once there it stays firmly in place. Cross’s name is engraved vertically at the top of the clip. “CROSS” is also engraved around the back of the cap.

The “quick” in this quick review means I only used the pen for a day or so. I used a black Cross ink cartridge since Cross uses a proprietary filling system and I want to use these up. The Cross ATX has a lot of good points, the top one being the nib. But it has several points I don’t like, the top (or bottom?) one being the metal section which is also on the thin side, at least for me. I don’t find the pen comfortable to write with for more than a page. What I don’t like doesn’t really make this a bad pen. It is what it is, and others may like a metal section and not find the pen uncomfortable.

The only problem I had was a hard start after letting the pen sit unused nib up for a week. I let it sit nib down for about 5 minutes and is was fine without needing to force the ink.

I’ve no idea how much this Cross Chrome pen cost back in 2006. It’s currently on Amazon for $60. I cautiously consider the pen a fair value at that price, if you like the chrome look and chrome section. I’m cautious because I can’t believe Cross can consistently repeat the nib quality in a sub $60 pen. But it does seem solidly built. According to the Cross website a converter is not included with the pen anymore so calculate a few extra bucks for that ($5.25 direct from Cross). The parts have a solid fit and there’s no rattling when I write. Despite this pen being several years old that doesn’t prove durability since it wasn’t used until recently.

The metal section, along with it being slightly too slim for me, means the Cross ATX isn’t a keeper for me.

The Numbers

  • Length Capped: 5.4910″ (139.47 mm)
  • Length Uncapped: 5.0260″ (127.66 mm)
  • Length Posted: 5.5870″ (144.44 mm)
  • Section Length: 1.160″ (29.47 mm)
  • Section Diameter (near nib): 0.3165″ (8.04 mm)
  • Section Diameter (below barrel): 0.4100″ (10.41 mm)
  • Section Diameter (mid-section): 0.3850″ (9.77 mm)
  • Cap Diameter: 0.4865″ (12.36 mm)
  • Barrel Diameter: 0.4865″ (12.36 mm)
  • Weight:  0.8 oz (24 g)
  • Weight (body only):  0.6 oz (16 g)

Additional Reading/Viewing

On FPN

Stephen Brown’s Video Review

Gallery

Review: Franklin-Christoph Model 25

Franklin-Christoph Model 25 on a mirrorThe Franklin-Christoph Model 25 Eclipse is a pen I bought back in September 2012. The Model 25 turns fountain pen design on its head, literally. When clipped in a pocket or pen case it’s nib down, unlike just about every other fountain pen ever made. While not unique for fountain pens in general, the Eclipse has a semi-hooded nib which makes it unique for Franklin-Christoph.

Because of the nib design the nib isn’t easily replaceable. F-C recommends sending it to them for a nib replacement. They also say they’ll email specific instructions upon request. Spoiler: I love my nib and have never considered replacing it.

Why I Got It

Another simple but unique design. The pen is designed to be carried nib down and that intrigued me. I’m not a fan of hooded nibs, I like the look of a nice big nib, but the semi-hooded nib peeks out enough to satisfy me.

This was also my first ever Mike Masuyama nib. I picked the medium stub since I wanted a nib I knew that I would like since swaps are a hassle.

While the pen currently has a choice of a creme or smoke band, at the time I ordered the pen the creme band was the only choice. Even though I like the smoke design I’d probably stick with creme even if I was ordering today. It provides a nice accent to the pen.

What I Got

Franklin-Christoph Model 25 nibA Franklin-Christoph Model 25 Eclipse with a steel Mike Masuyama medium (0.9 mm) stub. The pen is made of black acrylic with a rhodium plated clip and a creme band. The pen is a cartridge/converter fill. There’s metal in the barrel so an eyedropper conversion wouldn’t be advised. Franklin-Christoph also warns that the creme band will also darken if used as an eye dropper.

The semi-hooded nib allows for a small cap which can be slipped under the clip to “post”. If you consider this posting, then this is one pen I do post. If the clip wasn’t enough to prevent rolling, the cap will certainly prevent it when slipped under the clip.

The Franklin-Christoph logo is engraved in the finial on the top of the barrel. The creme band is just below the clip band. The spring loaded clip is rhodium plated and has the four Franklin-Christoph diamonds engraved in it. The clip ring has a very small “Franklin-Christoph” engraved on the back. The clip is attached to a clip ring rather than molded into the acrylic. The clip is firm and I usually need two hands to slide it into a pocket. Once clipped, it’s firmly attached to the pocket.

The barrel seam is noticeable in the photo at the top of this post. But in most normal room lighting it’s not noticeable. It’s manufactured to a high standard and the seam is very smooth.

Despite being carried nib down didn’t have any problem with ink in the cap. There hasn’t been any more ink than other traditional pens that are also bouncing around in my bag, and often less ink. Just a few drops on occasion.

The Numbers

  • Length Capped: 5.4655″ (138.83 mm)
  • Length Uncapped: 5.1980″ (132.03 mm)
  • Length Posted: same as uncapped
  • Section Length: N/A
  • Section Diameter (near nib): same as barrel
  • Section Diameter (below threads): N/A
  • Section Diameter (mid-section): N/A
  • Cap Diameter: 0.4710″ (11.96 mm)
  • Barrel Diameter: 0.4710″ (11.96 mm)
  • Weight: 0.7 oz (20 g)
  • Weight (body only): 0.6 oz (18 g)

Writing With The Pen

The semi-hooded nib would be extremely hard to clean if dipped in an ink bottle. I fill the pen either by dipping the converter into the ink for filling or I use a syringe to fill the converter.

The cap needs just under 1 1/2 rotations to remove and get the pen ready to write. I generally clip the cap under the clip when writing with the pen for anything other than a quick note. The pen is always carried or stored nib down so dry nibs are next to impossible. Even when stored flat on my desk for a night it’s ready to write in the morning.

I can pause for about 15 minutes before the ink evaporates off the semi-hooded nib, although this will vary by ink. (I used Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine.) Even after 15 minutes the skip was only the first stroke and the flow picked right up.

I love the medium stub. Even though fine and extra fine nibs are my preference the medium stub is still small enough for my writing and the stub adds some character to the writing. I do need to slow down just a bit to get the most from the nib, which isn’t a bad thing. But even if I go faster the nib is still problem free, it’s just my writing that suffers. I get some nice line variation from the nib and, depending on the ink, some nice shading. It’s more subtle than the 1.1 mm stub but unlike the 1.1 mm stub this one fits my writing. While the difference between .9 mm and 1.1 mm seems minor, on the nib it’s like night and day for me. Obviously I can’t write as small as an extra fine but the medium stub feels natural for me. The 1.1 mm stub requires a conscious effort to change my writing when I use it.

The same clip that makes it hard to slip into a pocket also securely holds the cap in place while I’m writing. I’ve never had it slip off.

This is a thin pen so I expected it to bother me when I’m writing, But since there’s no traditional section and I grip the barrel I haven’t had a problem. I find I can write for about 90 minutes before feeling any fatigue.

The pen is is a comfortable weight, with much of the weight coming from the metal clip. But this doesn’t make the pen feel top heavy since it sits in the web of my hand (between thumb and forefinger) when being used.

The medium stub nibs falls just short of being a daily writer for me since it’s not as forgiving as an extra fine. Using it to take notes at a meeting where my writing is quick isn’t the best use for it. But using it to draft a letter or web post is a perfect use for it. I slow down just a little which also allows me more time to think before I write.

Cleaning The Pen

Cleaning the hooded nib would be a major hassle so I’ve never dipped it into an ink bottle. So with that caveat I can say the pen has been easy to flush out after use. I frequently used the pen before getting the ultrasonic cleaner and it flushes easily with just the converter. It’s never been in the UC. A bulb syringe makes flushing faster but the collar around the feed is high so I would have to use a cutoff cartridge to get a good seal with by bulb syringe, otherwise water squirts back at me. So the old school method of using the converter to flush the pen is the easiest.

Inks Used

I’ve used many bottled inks since getting this pen. All worked well and were problem free. For this review I spent a month with a Pelikan Edelstein Aventurine cartridge in the pen. This was the first cartridge ever used in the pen. I’m about half way through the long international cartridge and it’s been skip free. I also let it sit for an enforced 5 days and it wrote immediately. Not really a surprise since it was stored in its natural nib down position.

Wrapping Up

The pen is a unique yet practical design. I used it a lot in the months after I got it and enjoyed every minute. But then I moved on and this pen was mostly forgotten and was last inked July 23rd of last year. That is just wrong for a nib this good so I’m glad I pulled it out for review. Over time the novelty of the pen design has warn off. So while I do like the looks of the pen I will admit the nib is more appealing than the pen. The Franklin-Christoph Model 25 Eclipse is a keeper, at least until I get a medium stub for one of my other F-C pens.

Additional Reading

Reviewed On FPN

FPGeeks

Gallery

 

Ink Notes: Caran D’Ache Chromatics Infinite Grey

Caran d'Ache Chromatics Infinite Grey boxCaran D’Ache recently replaced their entire fountain pen ink line with new, considerably more expensive, inks called Caran d’Ache Chromatics. Or as the box says – Caran d’Ache Chromatics INKCredible inks. These are the most expensive regular production fountain pen inks that I know of. At $32 for a 50 ml. bottle that works out to a whopping $0.64/ml. Pilot Iroshizuku inks top out at $0.56/ml, although it is sometimes on sale on Amazon.com. Graf von Faber-Castell, another recently reformulated luxery ink lin is just $0.40/ml. I see Montblanc special edition inks for a penny per milliliter less than Caran d’Ache. OK, I think I hammered the cost enough. This stuff is pricey so I expected a lot.

Caran d'Ache Chromatics Infinite Grey open bottleDespite the cost I decided to buy a full bottle rather than a sample. The bottle design is unique and I wanted at least one bottle. I’m currently enjoying grey inks so went with Infinite Grey since it was the most likely to please me. The bottle is different, maybe gimmicky, but I like it. It stands up straight in the box and sits at an angle when sitting on my desk. This makes it a little easier to see into the bottle to fill the pen. But I’m concerned it may make things harder when the ink level is low since the bottle starts off tipped.

The first pen I inked up with this liquid gold ink was my Franklin-Christoph Model 03 with an extra fine (but a wide extra fine) nib. It was heaven. I thought the ink was worth every penny. If that had been the only pen I used the ink in I’d be proclaiming it as the best ink ever and worth the cost. It’s the only ink that’s ever been in the pen so I can’t compare it to anything in that pen. There was some nice line variation and shading. Despite appearing to go on the paper very wet it was a quick drier. This may be the only ink I’ll use in the pen, at least until the bottle is empty.

Then I used it in other pens. In the Sheaffer Custom Legacy with an extra fine nib (and this one being a real extra fine) it was pretty bad. I ended up flushing it from the pen. I did a quick Waterman ink fill to see if maybe I had screwed up the pen. It wasn’t the pen, it was the ink. The nib is on the dry side and the ink did not like that one bit. There was a lot of skipping. A grey ink with a thin line starts off in a hole as far as visibility goes and the result was a disaster. The writing sample in the photos below look pretty good but was the best the ink did and it was a anomaly.

The Faber-Castell eMotion, a medium nib, also had some minor flow problems which is most visible in the horizontal and vertical lines. This pen has a smooth nib that is not a dry writer. It masks itself as line variation in the samples, but there was brief skipping when doing regular writing.

The Retro 51 Lincoln is one of the wettest medium nibs that I have. The Caran d’Ache Infinite Grey did well with this nib.There was some nice line variation and shading. I typically find this pen much too wet a nib to be pleasant for me. But the Infinite Grey was dry enough to be pleasant for me.

The Taccia Staccato resulted in some nice variation and shading. The pen did well with the ink, no complaints.

The properties of the ink are good, but not great. It washed almost completely away in the water test. Feathering was non-existent on all the papers I used. Bleed-through was nearly non-existent on the papers I used. The only bleed-through was minor and on some cheap, unknown office paper I tried. There wasn’t any bleed-through on the papers I typically use (such as Doane, Rhodia, and some Staples copy paper.

It’s hard for me to pin down the flow of this ink. It depends on the fountain pen. Flow was perfect with the F-C Model 03, terrible with the Sheaffer and OK with the Retro 51 although other inks are wetter in that pen. So I’d say flow is a little on the dry side.

Caran d'Ache Chromatics Infinite Grey bottleThe intensity of the grey (can grey be intense?) depends a lot on the paper and the pen which is why I like it. The shade of grey varies greatly based on the paper. Not just the color of the paper but also on how quickly the paper absorbs the ink. Non-absorbent papers (Rhodia) result in a lighter grey while  more absorbent paper (Doane) results in a darker grey. Caran d’Ache Chromatics Infinite Grey in the Model 03 writing on a Doane Paper writing pad is trifecta. The Doane Paper Jotter is nearly as good. This ink is very enjoyable on absorbent papers, less so on so-called “fountain pen friendly” papers like Rhodia.

This doesn’t make me want to run out an buy some of their other colors. I can’t justify the price difference compared to other inks but it was worth the cost to satisfy my curiosity and I really do like this grey. The bottle will provide several years supply for my Model 03.

Additional Reading and Viewing

Reviewed on FPN

Goulet Pens has a good comparison video showing all the Chromatics inks along with some comparisons.

Gallery

Nib Notes: Esterbrook #9284 Signature Stub

Esterbrook 9284 Stub nib side viewThe Esterbrook #9284 stub nib is unique among my accumulation in that it’s a straight stub and not a relief (oblique) stub nib. The nib is BIG! It’s much wider than my favored fine and extra fine nibs. Yet, I got a lot of enjoyment out of using the nib. It was fun watching it put the ink down on paper.

The 9xxx series nibs were Osmiridium tipped, unlike the 1xxx and 2xxx series nibs. This made it more durable and, at least in theory, smoother. Esterbrook called these “Master Renew Points.”

I don’t have a box, but Esterbrook literature refers to this nib as a “Signature Stub” which certainly seems appropriate. While the line does vary the widest stroke was about 1.2 mm wide when I wrote with it. The nib is quit forgiving of the writing angle. It quickly goes through a fill of ink, especially since I’m used to the ink frugal fine and extra fine nibs.

The nib is smooth and because it is wide it tends to glide right over the paper fibers. There is a little tooth to the nib but it pleasant to write with.

The Esterbrook #9284 stub isn’t going to be a daily writer for me, but it will be inked every so often because it’s fun to use.

Gallery